Examiner Kevin T Bates has allowed 24 of 72 decided applications (33%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kevin T Bates maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 72 disposed applications, 24 were allowed, yielding an overall allowance rate of 33%. The allowance rate ranges from 23% to 54% across these art units, reflecting variation in the record within TC 2100. This pooled figure represents decisions rendered across the examiner's assigned art units and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.
A pooled record aggregates results from multiple art units into a single allowance-rate figure. That figure describes the examiner's historical decisions across all assigned units combined and reflects the mix of work across those units. Pooled figures are correlational summaries of past dispositions, not predictive of outcomes in any individual application. The range shown reflects differences in allowance rates among the examiner's individual art units.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kevin T Bates has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 72 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP