LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/KEVIN T BATES
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Kevin T Bates

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 72 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Kevin T Bates has allowed 24 of 72 decided applications (33%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

33% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2155 · 23%AU 2153 · 54%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Kevin T Bates maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 72 disposed applications, 24 were allowed, yielding an overall allowance rate of 33%. The allowance rate ranges from 23% to 54% across these art units, reflecting variation in the record within TC 2100. This pooled figure represents decisions rendered across the examiner's assigned art units and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates results from multiple art units into a single allowance-rate figure. That figure describes the examiner's historical decisions across all assigned units combined and reflects the mix of work across those units. Pooled figures are correlational summaries of past dispositions, not predictive of outcomes in any individual application. The range shown reflects differences in allowance rates among the examiner's individual art units.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2155
48 APPS · 23% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

23% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION11 / 37 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION41.3 moart unit avg 27.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY58.2 moart unit avg 42.2 mo
ART UNIT 2153
24 APPS · 54% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

54% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION13 / 11 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION40 moart unit avg 27.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY65.1 moart unit avg 41.6 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Kevin T Bates

  • What is Kevin T Bates' overall allowance rate?
    The overall allowance rate is 33%, calculated from 24 allowed applications among 72 disposed applications across all art units.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Kevin T Bates has a public record in 2 art units within TC 2100.
  • Is the allowance rate the same in all art units?
    No. The allowance rate ranges from 23% to 54% across the examiner's art units, indicating variation in the record within TC 2100.
  • What does this pooled record mean for my application?
    The pooled allowance rate is a historical summary across multiple art units and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kevin T Bates has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 72 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP