LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/KEVIN W FIGUEROA
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Kevin W Figueroa

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 395 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Kevin W Figueroa has allowed 284 of 395 decided applications (72%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

72% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2124 · 73%AU 2122 · 65%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Kevin W Figueroa maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 395 disposed applications, his allowance rate stands at 72%, representing 284 allowed applications against 111 abandonments. The allowance rate ranges from 65% to 73% across these art units, reflecting variation in the examiner's record within this technology center. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across the different art units and reflects historical dispositions only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record combines statistics from multiple art units into a single aggregate profile. The allowance rate shown is the historical proportion of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units combined, not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Variation across individual art units may exist; the range provided reflects that diversity. Aggregate figures describe past record and do not forecast results in any particular case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2124
378 APPS · 73% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

73% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 64%
DISPOSITION253 / 94 / 31allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION28.9 moart unit avg 28.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY48.3 moart unit avg 41.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility64% · art unit 61%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)88%
§103 — Obviousness90% · art unit 88%
§112 — Written description & definiteness43%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW83%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW61%+22 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 191 decided applications with an interview and 156 without.

ART UNIT 2122
48 APPS · 65% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

65% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION31 / 17 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.3 moart unit avg 27.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY37 moart unit avg 39.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility52% · art unit 55%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)76%
§103 — Obviousness89% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness30%

Based on 48 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Kevin W Figueroa

  • What is Kevin W Figueroa's overall allowance rate?
    His pooled allowance rate is 72% across 395 disposed applications in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Figueroa has a record spanning 2 art units (2122 and 2124) within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary across his art units?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 65% to 73% across these art units, reflecting variation in outcomes by art unit.
  • What does this pooled record mean for my application?
    The pooled allowance rate describes historical dispositions and is not a prediction for any specific application. Individual outcomes depend on application facts and examination.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kevin W Figueroa has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 426 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP