Examiner Khanh B Pham has allowed 773 of 1,073 decided applications (72%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Khanh B Pham maintains a public record across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 1,073 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 72%, reflecting 773 allowed applications against 300 abandoned ones. The allowance rate ranges from 55% to 73% across the examiner's art units, indicating variation in outcomes by art unit. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate record and does not constitute a prediction about any individual application.
This record pools data across multiple art units in TC 2100, aggregating different subject areas and examination histories into one statistic. The overall allowance rate of 72% describes past outcomes across all units combined. The range (55% to 73%) reflects that allowance rates differ by art unit; this pooled figure is historical context, not a forecast of any specific application's disposition.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 484 decided applications with an interview and 537 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Khanh B Pham has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,126 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP