Examiner Khanh Q Dinh

What the data says.

Khanh Q Dinh maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Of 155 disposed applications, 109 were allowed and 46 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 70%. This rate reflects the outcome of decided cases across the examiner's pooled record and does not represent a prediction for any individual application. The figures are aggregated across multiple art units within TC 2100.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across all art units where the examiner works. The allowance rate of 70% describes historical outcomes in decided cases and reflects the mix of applications across those units. Aggregate figures are correlational and are not predictive of outcomes in any specific application. Understanding a pooled record requires recognizing that it combines different subject-matter areas and different case populations.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Khanh Q Dinh

• 01What is Khanh Q Dinh's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 70%, based on 109 allowed applications and 46 abandoned applications out of 155 disposed cases in the pooled record.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  The examiner works across 2 art units (2151 and 2155) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the pooled allowance rate tell me about my application?

  The pooled rate describes past outcomes across all of the examiner's art units and is not a prediction for any specific application. Individual outcomes depend on application merits, rejections, and prosecution history, not on aggregate statistics.
• 04What technology area does this examiner cover?

  The examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.