Examiner Kim T Huynh has allowed 687 of 846 decided applications (81%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kim T Huynh maintains an overall allowance rate of 81% across 846 decided applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner's record spans four art units: 2111, 2112, 2184, and 2185. Of the 885 total applications on file, 687 have been allowed and 159 abandoned. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 73% to 94%. This pooled figure represents the aggregate record and describes historical outcomes rather than a prediction for any individual application.
This page presents a pooled record aggregating Kim T Huynh's work across four art units within TC 2100. Pooled figures—such as the 81% allowance rate—combine outcomes from different subject-matter areas and reflect past disposition patterns. The allowance rate is computed from decided applications only (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending cases. Aggregate statistics describe the examiner's historical record and are not predictions of outcomes for specific applications.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 56 decided applications with an interview and 263 without.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 76 decided applications with an interview and 139 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 47 decided applications with an interview and 193 without.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring, and error-correcting coding/decoding.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 22 decided applications with an interview and 50 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kim T Huynh has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 885 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP