Examiner Kimberly L Jordan has allowed 300 of 434 decided applications (69%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kimberly L. Jordan maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 458 total applications, 300 were allowed and 134 were abandoned. Of 434 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 69%. This rate reflects the ratio of allowed to decided applications in her pooled record. The examiner's work spans a single art unit, consolidating her examination activity within TC 2100. These figures represent her historical disposition record and do not forecast outcomes in any individual case.
This pooled record aggregates activity across one art unit within TC 2100. An allowance rate of 69% is calculated from 434 decided applications (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending cases. Pooled figures describe the examiner's past record across her assigned art units and are correlational summaries, not predictive models for any specific application. Individual cases depend on claim scope, prior art, and application-specific facts.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 240 decided applications with an interview and 194 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kimberly L Jordan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 458 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP