LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/KISHIN G BELANI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Kishin G Belani

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 30 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Kishin G Belani has allowed 10 of 30 decided applications (33%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

33% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Kishin G Belani maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 30 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 33%, with 10 allowed and 20 abandoned. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled record represents outcomes on applications that have been decided; it does not include pending cases and is not a prediction of outcomes on any future or specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's record is pooled across all art units in which they work. The 33% allowance rate is an aggregate figure describing historical dispositions and reflects the overall balance of allowed versus abandoned applications decided to date. Pooled records combine different art units and do not forecast the outcome of any individual case. The specific art-unit breakdown is available separately.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2143
30 APPS · 33% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA
33% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 52%
DISPOSITION10 / 20 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION40.9 moart unit avg 29.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY51.2 moart unit avg 45.7 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Kishin G Belani

  • What is this examiner's allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 33%, based on 30 disposed applications (10 allowed, 20 abandoned). This describes the examiner's past record and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    This examiner works in one art unit within TC 2100.
  • What does this pooled record show?
    The pooled record aggregates all dispositions across the examiner's art units. It describes historical outcomes on decided applications and does not forecast any individual case.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kishin G Belani has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 30 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP