Examiner Konrad J Kulikowski has allowed 29 of 89 decided applications (33%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Konrad J Kulikowski maintains a public record of 89 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 29 were allowed and 60 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 33%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate represents the ratio of allowed to all disposed applications and is calculated from completed prosecution histories only; pending applications are excluded from this metric.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across one art unit over time. The 33% allowance rate describes what has occurred in past prosecution histories within TC 2100 and reflects the distribution of allowed and abandoned outcomes across 89 closed files. Pooled figures describe the historical record and are not predictions about any individual application or its path to resolution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 52 decided applications with an interview and 37 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Konrad J Kulikowski has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 89 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP