Examiner Koorosh Nehchiri has allowed 67 of 144 decided applications (47%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Koorosh Nehchiri maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 175 total applications, 144 applications have been disposed. Of those 144 decided applications, 67 were allowed and 77 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 47%. This record spans one art unit. The allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to total decided applications in this examiner's pooled history and does not constitute a prediction for any individual case.
This record aggregates all applications across Examiner Nehchiri's art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 47% allowance rate describes the historical ratio of allowed applications to all decided applications—not a forecast for specific filings. Pooled figures smooth variation across different art units and time periods. Past allowance rates are correlational data about completed applications, not predictive metrics for pending matters.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 68 decided applications with an interview and 76 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Koorosh Nehchiri has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 175 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP