LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/KRIS E MACKES
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Kris E Mackes

TECH CENTER 2100 · 5 ART UNITS · 631 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 5 ART UNITS

Examiner Kris E Mackes has allowed 500 of 631 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

79% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2153 · 88%AU 2168 · 72%AU 2164 · 22%AU 2154 · 36%AU 2169 · 0%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Kris E Mackes has a public record of 649 total applications across five art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 631 disposed applications, 500 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 79%. The examiner's allowance rate varies across art units, ranging from 22% to 88%. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across multiple distinct art units and reflects historical dispositions only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record pools allowance rates across five separate art units in TC 2100. The aggregate 79% allowance rate describes past outcomes across all units combined and is not a prediction for any individual application. Allowance rates may differ substantially among art units within the same technology center. The range of 22% to 88% illustrates this variation. Pooled data reflects historical performance, not prospective outcomes.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2153
454 APPS · 88% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

88% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION384 / 52 / 18allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.2 moart unit avg 27.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY30.1 moart unit avg 41.6 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility39% · art unit 54%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)72%
§103 — Obviousness67% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness23%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW90%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW86%+4 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 187 decided applications with an interview and 249 without.

ART UNIT 2168
144 APPS · 72% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

72% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 65%
DISPOSITION103 / 41 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.7 moart unit avg 23.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY47.7 moart unit avg 43.5 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility54% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)59%
§103 — Obviousness90% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness32%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW80%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW66%+14 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 59 decided applications with an interview and 85 without.

ART UNIT 2164
36 APPS · 22% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

22% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 62%
DISPOSITION8 / 28 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION25 moart unit avg 22.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY45.2 moart unit avg 43.4 mo
ART UNIT 2154
14 APPS · 36% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

36% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION5 / 9 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION27.6 moart unit avg 27.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY55 moart unit avg 41.9 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility33% · art unit 55%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)67%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 87%
§112 — Written description & definiteness33%

Based on 14 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

ART UNIT 2169
1 APPS · 0% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

0% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 47%
DISPOSITION0 / 1 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTIONart unit avg 24.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY2.3 moart unit avg 40 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Kris E Mackes

  • What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?
    Across 631 disposed applications, Kris E Mackes allowed 500, for an allowance rate of 79%. This is a pooled figure across all art units and describes past outcomes only.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Kris E Mackes has a public record spanning five art units in Technology Center 2100: 2153, 2154, 2164, 2168, and 2169.
  • Does the allowance rate vary by art unit?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 22% to 88% across the examiner's art units, reflecting meaningful variation in outcomes by subject matter within TC 2100.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate tell me about my application?
    The 79% pooled rate reflects historical outcomes across all of this examiner's art units combined. It is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome and does not account for the particular art unit, claims, prior art, or application facts.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kris E Mackes has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 649 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP