Examiner Krisna Lim has allowed 210 of 233 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Krisna Lim maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 233 disposed applications in art unit 2153, the examiner issued 210 allowances and 23 abandonments, for an allowance rate of 90%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided applications. The examiner's record spans a single art unit within TC 2100. These figures describe the examiner's historical record and do not constitute a prediction for any specific pending or future application.
This pooled record aggregates data from one art unit across TC 2100. The 90% allowance rate is calculated from 233 decided applications—allowed and abandoned combined—and describes past disposition only. Aggregate figures reflect historical output but are not predictive of outcomes in individual cases. Each application is examined on its own merits under the statutory requirements.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 23 decided applications with an interview and 210 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Krisna Lim has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 233 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP