Examiner Kristin D Sandoval

What the data says.

Kristin D Sandoval maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 79 disposed applications, she allowed 53 and abandoned 26, yielding an allowance rate of 67%. Her record spans a single art unit (2132). This aggregate figure describes the examiner's pooled historical dispositions and does not forecast the outcome of any particular application. The allowance rate reflects the share of decided cases that resulted in allowance among all closed matters in her record.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units under the examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate of 67% describes past dispositions as a proportion of all decided applications (allowed and abandoned combined), excluding pending cases. Aggregate historical figures describe the examiner's record and are not predictions of how any individual application will be examined or decided. Different art units may have different characteristics and allowance patterns.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Questions about Examiner Kristin D Sandoval

• 01What is Kristin D Sandoval's overall allowance rate?

  Her allowance rate is 67%, calculated from 53 allowed applications among 79 total disposed applications in her pooled record.
• 02How many art units does she cover?

  Kristin D Sandoval's record spans one art unit (2132) in Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does this allowance rate mean for my application?

  This aggregate rate describes her historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual applications vary based on claim scope, prior art, and examination factors unique to each case.
• 04How many applications has she decided?

  She has disposed of 79 applications in total, of which 53 were allowed and 26 were abandoned.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.