Examiner Kristina B Honeycutt

What the data says.

Kristina B Honeycutt's public record spans one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 39 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 33%, with 13 allowed and 26 abandoned. This allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to decided applications and does not represent a share of all filings. The record covers a single art unit, making it a pooled view of examination activity in that unit. These figures describe the examiner's historical record and are not predictions about any future application.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates examination data across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate shown here—33% over 39 decided applications—reflects past outcomes in those units combined. This aggregate figure describes what has occurred, not what will occur on any specific application. Applicants and practitioners use pooled statistics to understand an examiner's overall record; per-art-unit breakdowns are available separately and offer more granular insight.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Questions about Examiner Kristina B Honeycutt

• 01What is Kristina B Honeycutt's allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 33%, based on 39 disposed applications (13 allowed, 26 abandoned). This is a historical figure and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  The record covers one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). These figures are pooled across that unit.
• 03What do these statistics mean?

  These figures describe past examination outcomes. The allowance rate is the percentage of decided applications that were allowed. These are correlations, not causal relationships, and they do not predict outcomes on any individual application.
• 04Is this record complete?

  This public record reflects dispositions (allowed and abandoned applications) and excludes pending applications. It represents the examiner's decided caseload in TC 2100.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.