Examiner Kristofer M Biskeborn has allowed 24 of 44 decided applications (55%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kristofer M Biskeborn has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, 44 applications have been disposed. Of those decided applications, 24 were allowed and 20 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 55%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's past record across all assigned art units and reflects the proportion of disposed applications that received allowances.
This record aggregates the examiner's work across all art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 55% describes the historical proportion of decided applications that were allowed. Pooled figures reflect past outcomes and do not constitute a prediction for any individual application. Different art units within the technology center may carry different subject-matter complexities; this aggregate does not isolate or weight performance by unit.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 44 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kristofer M Biskeborn has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 44 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP