Examiner Kuang Fu Chen has allowed 230 of 285 decided applications (81%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kuang Fu Chen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 285 applications. Of those decided applications, 230 were allowed and 55 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 81%. The examiner's total application inventory is 329, which includes pending matters. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's record across all assigned art units and reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition.
This pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to the examiner. The allowance rate of 81% describes the examiner's historical proportion of allowed to decided applications and is calculated from the disposed application count, not the total filing count. Pooled figures describe the examiner's overall past record and are not predictive of outcomes in any individual application. For art-unit-specific data, consult the separate per-unit sections.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 242 decided applications with an interview and 43 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kuang Fu Chen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 329 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP