Examiner Kurosu R Altaf has allowed 50 of 52 decided applications (96%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Kurosu R Altaf maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 52 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 50 and abandoned 2, yielding an allowance rate of 96%. This record spans one art unit. The data reflects decisions on applications examined in TC 2100 and is presented as a pooled aggregate across all art units in the examiner's portfolio.
This profile aggregates the examiner's entire record across all assigned art units, pooling decisions to form an overall allowance rate. The 96% figure describes past outcomes on 52 decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled records mask variation across art units and reflect historical decisions only. Individual art-unit records, where available, offer finer-grained context.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 29 decided applications with an interview and 23 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kurosu R Altaf has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 52 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP