LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/KURT NICHOLAS PRESSLY
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Kurt Nicholas Pressly

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 23 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Kurt Nicholas Pressly has allowed 6 of 23 decided applications (26%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

26% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Patent Examiner Kurt Nicholas Pressly maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit and covers 68 total applications. Of 23 disposed applications, 6 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 26 percent. Seventeen applications were abandoned. The allowance rate of 26 percent represents the proportion of decided cases—allowed and abandoned applications combined—and does not reflect the share of all filings. This figure describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction of outcomes in any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile presents pooled statistics across all art units handled by this examiner. Aggregate figures describe the examiner's past record and provide context for understanding disposition patterns. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending cases. Pooled data combines different art units and does not forecast results in individual applications or predict how any particular case will be examined.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2125
68 APPS · 26% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

26% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 75%
DISPOSITION6 / 17 / 45allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION35.6 moart unit avg 26.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY51.6 moart unit avg 39 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility95% · art unit 50%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)98%
§103 — Obviousness97% · art unit 88%
§112 — Written description & definiteness67%
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Kurt Nicholas Pressly

  • What is Kurt Nicholas Pressly's allowance rate?
    His allowance rate is 26 percent, based on 6 allowed applications out of 23 total disposed applications in his pooled record.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Examiner Pressly's public record spans one art unit (2125) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate mean?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) that were allowed. It does not include pending cases and is calculated from 23 disposed applications in this examiner's pooled record.
  • What is the scope of this data?
    This record covers 68 total applications examined by Kurt Nicholas Pressly, pooled across all his art units. It describes his historical record and is not a prediction of outcomes in any specific application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kurt Nicholas Pressly has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 68 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP