Examiner Kyle A Emanuele has allowed 93 of 98 decided applications (95%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kyle A Emanuele maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 98 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 93 and abandoned 5, yielding an allowance rate of 95%. This rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not include pending filings. The record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition in TC 2100.
This pooled record aggregates results across all art units in which the examiner operates. The allowance rate of 95% describes the historical proportion of decided applications that were allowed, based on the 98 applications that have reached final disposition. Aggregate figures describe the past record only and are not predictions about any specific application or future prosecution outcome.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 42 decided applications with an interview and 56 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kyle A Emanuele has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 98 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP