Examiner Kyle Hwa-Kai Tseng has allowed 11 of 19 decided applications (58%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kyle Hwa-Kai Tseng holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 55 total applications, 19 have been disposed (decided). Of those 19 disposed applications, 11 were allowed and 8 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 58% over the decided count. The examiner operates within a single art unit (2189). This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications in that unit and represents historical data only, not a forecast for any individual case.
This record aggregates all applications handled by the examiner across their art unit(s) in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 58% is calculated from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending cases. Pooled figures describe the examiner's past output and do not constitute a prediction about the outcome of any specific application or the likelihood of allowance in future cases.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kyle Hwa-Kai Tseng has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 55 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP