Examiner Kyle Vallecillo has allowed 654 of 757 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kyle Vallecillo maintains a public record of 757 disposed applications across one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 654 were allowed and 103 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 86%. This allowance rate is computed from the ratio of allowed and abandoned applications to all disposed applications, and represents the examiner's historical record across the pooled art unit.
This pooled record aggregates data from a single art unit. The allowance rate of 86% describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Allowance rates vary by art unit, technology center, and applicant population. Historical figures serve as context for an examiner's record but do not determine the fate of any individual case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring, and error-correcting coding/decoding.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 329 decided applications with an interview and 428 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kyle Vallecillo has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 757 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP