Examiner Lahcen Ennaji has allowed 132 of 189 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Lahcen Ennaji maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 189 disposed applications, 132 were allowed and 57 abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 70%. This figure represents decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The record reflects outcomes across the pooled art unit in TC 2100 over the period covered by public USPTO data.
A pooled record aggregates all applications filed in an examiner's assigned art units, presenting an overall allowance rate rather than unit-by-unit breakdowns. The 70% allowance rate describes past dispositions and is a historical statistic only—it is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate figures mask variation across individual art units and do not forecast results in any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 110 decided applications with an interview and 79 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Lahcen Ennaji has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 189 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP