Examiner Lan Dai T Truong has allowed 20 of 53 decided applications (38%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Lan Dai T Truong maintains a public record across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 53 disposed applications, the examiner has allowed 20 and abandoned 33, yielding an allowance rate of 38%. This rate reflects decisions made on the full set of applications that have reached final disposition in the examiner's pooled caseload. The record spans art units 2132, 2143, and 2152, aggregating activity across multiple areas of the technology center's subject matter.
A pooled record aggregates an examiner's decisions across multiple art units into a single allowance figure. This aggregate rate describes the examiner's past decisions and reflects historical outcomes across different technology areas. Aggregate statistics do not predict outcomes on any individual application. Each application's outcome depends on claim scope, prior art, and examiner assessment of patentability under applicable law. Pooled data provides a general baseline for historical allowance frequency only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Lan Dai T Truong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 53 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP