LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/LARRY D DONAGHUE
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Larry D Donaghue

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 131 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Larry D Donaghue has allowed 117 of 131 decided applications (89%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

89% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Larry D Donaghue maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 131 disposed applications, 117 were allowed and 14 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 89%. This pooled figure reflects outcomes decided over the examiner's record in TC 2100. The allowance rate is computed from disposed applications only and does not include pending filings. This public data describes past outcomes and does not forecast results on any individual application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates dispositions across the examiner's art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 89% allowance rate is a historical average of decided cases and is not predictive of any specific application's outcome. Pooled statistics describe the past and reflect the mix of technology and prosecution history in cases the examiner has closed. Individual applications may proceed along different paths based on claim scope, prior art, and case facts.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2154
131 APPS · 89% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

89% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION117 / 14 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION27 moart unit avg 27.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY44.1 moart unit avg 41.9 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Larry D Donaghue

  • What is the overall allowance rate for this examiner?
    The allowance rate is 89%, based on 117 allowed applications and 14 abandoned applications among 131 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    The examiner's record spans one art unit (Art Unit 2154) in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • What does the allowance rate mean for my application?
    The allowance rate describes past outcomes in disposed cases and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Each application is evaluated on its own merits, claim scope, and prior art.
  • Does this record include pending applications?
    No. The allowance rate and all disposed-application figures exclude pending filings. The 131 disposed applications are those that have been decided (allowed or abandoned).
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Larry D Donaghue has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 131 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP