Examiner Lashonda T Jacobs-Burton has allowed 95 of 148 decided applications (64%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Lashonda T Jacobs-Burton maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 148 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 64%, with 95 applications allowed and 53 abandoned. The record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents the examiner's past decisions on decided applications and does not constitute a prediction of the outcome of any particular case.
This pooled record aggregates all applications decided across the examiner's art units, creating a single allowance-rate figure. Aggregate statistics describe historical disposition patterns and are not predictions for individual applications. Different art units within TC 2100 may have different subject matter or application volumes; pooled rates combine those variations into one overall figure. The data reflects what has occurred, not what will occur in any specific prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 71 decided applications with an interview and 77 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Lashonda T Jacobs-Burton has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 148 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP