Examiner Lauren Zannah Ganger has allowed 255 of 305 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Lauren Zannah Ganger maintains a pooled allowance rate of 84% across 305 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Her public record spans two art units: 2156 and 2167. Of 326 total applications, 255 were allowed and 50 were abandoned. The allowance rate ranges from 81% to 98% across these art units, reflecting variation in the decided rates within each unit's record.
This pooled profile aggregates Examiner Ganger's record across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 84% figure represents historical outcomes on decided applications and describes past dispositions only. Allowance rates in aggregated records do not account for differences in application complexity, claim scope, or prior-art positions across individual cases. Aggregate data is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 88 decided applications with an interview and 169 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 16 decided applications with an interview and 32 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Lauren Zannah Ganger has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 326 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP