LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/LAWRENCE W LUK
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Lawrence W Luk

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 43 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION AUG 2006
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Lawrence W Luk has allowed 30 of 43 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

70% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Lawrence W Luk maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 43 disposed applications, 30 were allowed and 13 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 70%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate reflects outcomes on applications already decided; it does not represent a prediction for any pending or future application, nor does it account for applications still in prosecution.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications decided by the examiner across his assigned art unit(s). The 70% allowance rate describes past dispositions on a closed set of 43 applications. Aggregate figures characterize the examiner's historical record and are not predictions about any specific application's outcome. Understanding the breadth (number of art units) helps contextualize whether the record reflects experience across multiple subject areas or concentration in a single area.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2187
43 APPS · 70% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).

70% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION30 / 13 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION14.3 moart unit avg 23.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY35.1 moart unit avg 36.4 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Lawrence W Luk

  • What is Lawrence W Luk's overall allowance rate?
    70%, based on 30 allowed applications among 43 total disposed applications in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    One art unit (2187). This record is pooled across that single unit.
  • What does the allowance rate mean?
    It reflects the percentage of already-decided applications that were allowed. It is a historical measure, not a prediction for any pending application.
  • Does this record cover all applications filed with this examiner?
    No. The allowance rate covers only disposed (decided) applications. Pending applications are excluded from the calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Lawrence W Luk has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 43 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP