Examiner Lawrence W Luk has allowed 30 of 43 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Lawrence W Luk maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 43 disposed applications, 30 were allowed and 13 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 70%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate reflects outcomes on applications already decided; it does not represent a prediction for any pending or future application, nor does it account for applications still in prosecution.
This pooled record aggregates all applications decided by the examiner across his assigned art unit(s). The 70% allowance rate describes past dispositions on a closed set of 43 applications. Aggregate figures characterize the examiner's historical record and are not predictions about any specific application's outcome. Understanding the breadth (number of art units) helps contextualize whether the record reflects experience across multiple subject areas or concentration in a single area.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Lawrence W Luk has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 43 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP