Examiner Le V Nguyen has allowed 195 of 453 decided applications (43%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Le V Nguyen maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 453 disposed applications, 195 were allowed, yielding a 43% allowance rate. The allowance rate varies across art units, ranging from 37% to 93%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's overall record aggregated across the breadth of the examined subject matter and does not forecast the outcome of any individual application.
This record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units within TC 2100, each with potentially different subject-matter complexity and applicant behavior. The 43% allowance rate is a historical aggregate and reflects past decisions on 453 closed applications. Pooled figures do not predict results on any future filing. Applicants may review the per-art-unit breakdown, available separately, for more granular context specific to their technology area.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 217 decided applications with an interview and 190 without.
Based on 46 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Le V Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 453 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP