Examiner Lenin Paulino has allowed 210 of 352 decided applications (60%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Lenin Paulino maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 352 disposed applications, 210 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 60%. The allowance rate ranges from 58% to 61% across these art units. A total of 393 applications appear in the examiner's record; 142 were abandoned. These figures represent the examiner's historical record pooled across all art units and do not forecast outcomes in any specific application.
This record aggregates data across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 60% allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending cases. The range from 58% to 61% reflects variation among the examiner's art units but does not identify which unit achieved which rate. Pooled figures describe past output and are not predictions for individual filings.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution, and software engineering.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 90 decided applications with an interview and 114 without.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 108 decided applications with an interview and 40 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Lenin Paulino has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 393 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP