Examiner Leonard A Sieger

What the data says.

Leonard A Sieger maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a single art unit, the examiner's pooled record spans 122 disposed applications, of which 44 were allowed and 78 were abandoned. The allowance rate is 36% over the 122 decided applications. This rate represents the examiner's historical disposition of applications that reached a final decision—either allowance or abandonment—and does not include applications currently pending.

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates outcomes across all art units in which the examiner works. The pooled allowance rate reflects historical decisions on completed applications and describes past outcomes only. Aggregate figures do not constitute a prediction for any individual application. Each application presents distinct claims, prior art, and circumstances. The record shows the examiner's overall profile but does not forecast the outcome of any specific prosecution.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Leonard A Sieger

• 01What is Leonard A Sieger's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 36%, calculated over 122 disposed applications (44 allowed, 78 abandoned).
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The public record covers 1 art unit (Art Unit 2126) in Technology Center 2100.
• 03Does this allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?

  No. The allowance rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Each prosecution depends on claim scope, prior art, and examiner actions unique to that case.
• 04What subject matter does this examiner handle?

  The examiner works in TC 2100, which covers Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.