Examiner Leslie Wong has allowed 687 of 827 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Leslie Wong has disposed of 827 applications across three art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 687 were allowed, yielding an 83% allowance rate. The examiner's record spans art units 2164, 2167, and 2177. Allowance rates vary across these art units, ranging from 67% to 84%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate record across all three art units and does not identify performance within any single art unit.
This page presents Leslie Wong's pooled record—a combined view across multiple art units. The 83% allowance rate describes what happened in past applications already decided; it is a historical summary, not a forecast. Because the record aggregates different art units, individual rates within each unit may differ from the pooled figure. Separate pages detail the examiner's record in each art unit individually. Pooled statistics describe the examiner's past dispositions and do not predict outcomes in any specific application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 323 decided applications with an interview and 457 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Leslie Wong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 827 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP