LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/LEYNNA THANH TRUVAN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Leynna Thanh Truvan

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 46 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Leynna Thanh Truvan has allowed 20 of 46 decided applications (43%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

43% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2135 · 44%AU 2131 · 0%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Leynna Thanh Truvan maintains a pooled public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across two art units: 2131 and 2135. Over 46 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 20 and abandoned 26. The allowance rate stands at 43%, calculated across all decided applications in the pooled record. This figure reflects historical dispositions and does not indicate the outcome of any particular application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 43% allowance rate describes past dispositions across all art units combined and reflects the historical ratio of allowed to decided applications. Pooled figures do not predict outcomes for individual applications or characterize examination in any specific art unit; they serve as a factual summary of the examiner's aggregate record.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2135
45 APPS · 44% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

44% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 66%
DISPOSITION20 / 25 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION37.6 moart unit avg 26.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY66.6 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
ART UNIT 2131
1 APPS · 0% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

0% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 56%
DISPOSITION0 / 1 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION17.3 moart unit avg 26.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY29.2 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Leynna Thanh Truvan

  • What is Examiner Truvan's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 43% across 46 disposed applications pooled from all art units.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    This pooled record spans 2 art units (2131 and 2135) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate mean for my application?
    The pooled allowance rate describes historical dispositions across all art units combined. It is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
  • How many applications has the examiner decided?
    The examiner has disposed 46 applications: 20 allowed and 26 abandoned.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Leynna Thanh Truvan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 46 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP