Examiner Lilian Vo has allowed 35 of 57 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Lilian Vo maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning 2 art units. Across 57 disposed applications, 35 were allowed and 22 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 61%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units and reflects historical dispositions only, not predictions about future applications. The record encompasses a moderate volume of decided cases in the technology center.
A pooled record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units within a technology center. The allowance rate represents the percentage of applications decided (allowed or abandoned) and reflects past outcomes only. Pooled figures do not predict results in any specific application. Art units may have different allowance rates; this overall figure is a combined snapshot and is not a substitute for art-unit-specific analysis when available.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 16 decided applications with an interview and 36 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Lilian Vo has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 57 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP