Examiner Linda Tang Huynh has allowed 105 of 262 decided applications (40%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Linda Tang Huynh maintains a public record across 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 262 decided applications, her allowance rate stands at 40%. This reflects 105 allowed applications and 157 abandoned applications. The allowance rate varies across her art units, ranging from 25% to 73%. This record aggregates her work across different subject areas within TC 2100 and describes outcomes on applications already decided.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units, providing a broad view of an examiner's historical record in a technology center. The overall allowance rate describes past decisions on closed applications and is not predictive of outcomes on any specific pending application. Variations across individual art units may reflect differences in subject matter or application complexity within the technology center. Art-unit-specific records appear in separate sections.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 99 decided applications with an interview and 52 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 33 decided applications with an interview and 18 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 31 decided applications with an interview and 29 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Linda Tang Huynh has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 303 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP