Examiner Linh L D Son

What the data says.

Examiner Linh L D Son maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner's record spans 34 disposed applications, of which 15 were allowed and 19 were abandoned. This corresponds to an allowance rate of 44% over the decided applications. The pooled record covers a single art unit and does not break down performance across multiple technology areas or specialties. These figures represent the examiner's historical output and are descriptive of the past record only.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data from all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications—those that were allowed or abandoned—and does not include pending cases. This aggregate figure describes the examiner's historical record across their assigned art units and is not a prediction of the outcome in any specific application. Per-art-unit records, where available separately, provide more granular subject-matter context.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Questions about Examiner Linh L D Son

• 01What is Examiner Linh L D Son's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 44%, based on 15 allowed applications out of 34 total disposed applications.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  This pooled record covers one art unit (Art Unit 2135) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What do these figures mean for my application?

  These figures describe the examiner's historical record and are not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Allowance rates reflect past dispositions and vary based on application-specific factors, claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.
• 04How many applications has this examiner decided?

  The examiner has disposed of 34 applications, of which 15 were allowed and 19 were abandoned.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.