Examiner Luke R Osborne has allowed 172 of 274 decided applications (63%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Luke R Osborne maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 274 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 63%, with 172 allowed and 102 abandoned. This pooled figure represents outcomes across art units 2123 and 2163. The allowance rate reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications. This record is a historical aggregate and does not predict outcomes in any specific case.
This examiner's record is pooled across multiple art units within TC 2100, meaning the 63% allowance rate combines outcomes from different areas of the technology center. Aggregate figures describe past disposition patterns and are correlational—they reflect what occurred in closed cases but are not predictions about any particular future application. Individual art-unit records may show different rates and are available separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 53 decided applications with an interview and 218 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Luke R Osborne has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 274 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP