Examiner Luu-Phuong T Nguyen has allowed 91 of 179 decided applications (51%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Luu-Phuong T Nguyen's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner's pooled allowance rate is 51%, measured across 179 disposed applications. Of those decided applications, 91 were allowed and 88 were abandoned. The examiner operates in 1 art unit. This allowance rate represents the examiner's historical record across all art units combined and reflects the ratio of allowed applications to total decided cases in that pooled population.
A pooled record aggregates data from all art units an examiner covers. The aggregate figures—allowance rate and application counts—describe the examiner's past performance across that combined portfolio. These figures are historical summaries, not predictions about any specific application. To understand performance in a particular art unit or subject matter, refer to art-unit-level data if available separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 104 decided applications with an interview and 75 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Luu-Phuong T Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 179 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP