Examiner Magdalena Izabella Kossek

What the data says.

Magdalena Izabella Kossek maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 45 total applications, 13 have been disposed (allowed or abandoned). Of those 13 decided applications, 9 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 69%. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled figure reflects the overall pattern of dispositions across the examiner's assigned work in TC 2100 and does not address pending applications.

How to read these numbers.

This record pools all applications across the examiner's art units, aggregating outcomes from multiple subject-matter areas within TC 2100. The allowance rate (69%) describes the examiner's past record of decided cases and reflects the proportion of allowed outcomes among disposed applications only—not among all filings, which include pending matters. Aggregate figures describe historical performance and are not predictions about any specific application.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines control or regulating systems.

Questions about Examiner Magdalena Izabella Kossek

• 01What is Magdalena Izabella Kossek's allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 69%, based on 9 allowed applications out of 13 disposed applications. This figure does not include pending applications and does not predict outcomes in any specific case.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The examiner's public record spans one art unit in TC 2100.
• 03What does the 69% allowance rate mean?

  The allowance rate reflects the proportion of applications that were allowed among all decided (disposed) applications—those that were either allowed or abandoned. It does not include pending cases and is not a prediction of future outcomes.
• 04How many applications has this examiner handled?

  The examiner has handled 45 total applications. Of these, 13 have been disposed (9 allowed, 4 abandoned), and the remainder are pending.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.