Examiner Maggie T Maido has allowed 26 of 41 decided applications (63%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Maggie T Maido's public record spans one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 107 total applications, 41 have been disposed (decided). Of those 41 decided applications, 26 were allowed and 15 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 63% over the disposed count. This pooled figure reflects outcomes across all art units under this examiner's jurisdiction and describes the historical record only.
This examiner's record is pooled across all assigned art units. The allowance rate of 63% aggregates outcomes from multiple art units and describes past disposition patterns, not predictions for any individual application. Pooled figures mask variation within each art unit. The per-art-unit breakdown, where available separately, may show different rates and application volumes. Aggregate data informs context but does not forecast the outcome of a specific case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 22 decided applications with an interview and 19 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Maggie T Maido has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 107 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP