LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MAGGIE T MAIDO
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Maggie T Maido

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 41 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Maggie T Maido has allowed 26 of 41 decided applications (63%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

63% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Maggie T Maido's public record spans one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 107 total applications, 41 have been disposed (decided). Of those 41 decided applications, 26 were allowed and 15 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 63% over the disposed count. This pooled figure reflects outcomes across all art units under this examiner's jurisdiction and describes the historical record only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's record is pooled across all assigned art units. The allowance rate of 63% aggregates outcomes from multiple art units and describes past disposition patterns, not predictions for any individual application. Pooled figures mask variation within each art unit. The per-art-unit breakdown, where available separately, may show different rates and application volumes. Aggregate data informs context but does not forecast the outcome of a specific case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2129
107 APPS · 63% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

63% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 65%
DISPOSITION26 / 15 / 66allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION34.7 moart unit avg 28.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY50.8 moart unit avg 42.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility70% · art unit 63%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)96%
§103 — Obviousness96% · art unit 75%
§112 — Written description & definiteness63%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW77%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW47%+30 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 22 decided applications with an interview and 19 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Maggie T Maido

  • What is Maggie T Maido's allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 63%, calculated from 26 allowed applications out of 41 total disposed applications in the public record.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The pooled record covers one art unit: 2129, within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate mean?
    The pooled rate aggregates outcomes across all art units assigned to this examiner and describes the historical record. It is not a prediction for any specific application and does not account for differences between individual art units.
  • How many total applications are in this record?
    The record includes 107 total applications. Of these, 41 have been disposed (decided), 15 abandoned, and 26 allowed.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Maggie T Maido has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 107 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP