Examiner Maher N Algibhah has allowed 253 of 283 decided applications (89%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Maher N Algibhah maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner's pooled record spans a single art unit (2165) and covers 313 total applications. Of 283 disposed applications, 253 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 89%. Thirty applications were abandoned. This record is drawn from completed dispositions; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
This pooled record aggregates data across all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate and application counts describe the examiner's past record—what has been decided—and are not predictions about the outcome of any specific application. Aggregate figures mask variation across individual art units and over time. They reflect historical dispositions only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 168 decided applications with an interview and 115 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Maher N Algibhah has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 313 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP