Examiner Mahesh H Dwivedi has allowed 715 of 983 decided applications (73%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mahesh H Dwivedi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 1,018 total applications, 983 have been disposed. Of those disposed applications, 715 were allowed and 268 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 73% over the 983 decided cases. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across a single art unit (2168) and represents the historical record of allowances and abandonments resolved to date.
A pooled record aggregates results across multiple art units into a single historical profile. The 73% allowance rate reflects past dispositions—both allowances and abandonments—across the examiner's assigned art units and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate statistics describe the examiner's overall record and do not forecast the result of any individual case or art-unit subset.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 560 decided applications with an interview and 423 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mahesh H Dwivedi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,018 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP