Examiner Majd Maher Haddad

What the data says.

Examiner Majd Maher Haddad maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a single art unit, the examiner has disposed of 2 applications. Both disposed applications were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 100% over the decided count. The examiner's overall record spans 36 total applications. This pooled figure reflects past decisions and describes the examiner's historical record only; it is not a prediction of outcomes on any pending or future application.

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates decisions across a single art unit within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 100% is calculated from 2 decided applications and reflects the examiner's past record. Pooled figures describe historical data and do not forecast the outcome of any specific application. Different art units may have varying examination patterns; this aggregate statistic does not predict results on individual cases.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Majd Maher Haddad

• 01What is Examiner Haddad's allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 100%, based on 2 disposed (decided) applications, both allowed. This describes the past record only and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The examiner's public record spans 1 art unit within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the 100% figure mean for my application?

  The 100% allowance rate reflects the examiner's historical dispositions and does not forecast the outcome of any pending or future application. Each application is examined independently on its merits.
• 04Why is the total application count (36) different from the decided count (2)?

  The allowance rate is calculated only from decided (disposed) applications. The 36 total applications include pending cases, which are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.