Examiner Majid A Banankhah has allowed 66 of 74 decided applications (89%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Majid A Banankhah's public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spans 2 art units and covers 74 disposed applications. Of these decided cases, 66 were allowed, yielding an overall allowance rate of 89%. The record shows variation across the examiner's art units, with allowance rates ranging from 84% to 100%. These figures represent the examiner's historical record across all art units in this technology center and do not constitute a prediction for any specific pending application.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units in TC 2100. The 89% allowance rate reflects past dispositions—allowed and abandoned applications combined—among 74 decided cases. Because the record spans different art units with distinct allowance rates (84% to 100%), the aggregate figure masks variation by subject matter within the technology center. Pooled statistics describe historical patterns and are not predictions for individual applications.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Majid A Banankhah has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 74 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP