Examiner Mandrita Brahmachari has allowed 315 of 412 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mandrita Brahmachari's public record spans 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 412 decided applications, the examiner allowed 315, yielding an allowance rate of 76%. The allowance rate varies across the art units, ranging from 63% to 83%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate record and does not describe the outcome of any particular application.
A pooled record aggregates statistics across multiple art units, smoothing variations in individual unit performance into a single figure. The 76% allowance rate reflects historical decisions on 412 applications already concluded. This aggregate statistic describes what occurred in the examiner's past record and is not a prediction of what will occur in any new filing. Individual art-unit performance may differ from the pooled average.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 137 decided applications with an interview and 71 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 86 decided applications with an interview and 41 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 49 decided applications with an interview and 28 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mandrita Brahmachari has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 458 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP