Examiner Marcin R Filipczyk has allowed 476 of 698 decided applications (68%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Marcin R Filipczyk's public record spans 6 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 698 disposed applications, the examiner issued allowances in 476 cases, yielding a 68% allowance rate. The examiner's record across TC 2100 art units ranges from 45% to 77% allowance rates. The examiner has also recorded 222 abandoned applications. This pooled record reflects activity across multiple art units with varying allowance patterns.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across 6 separate art units. The pooled allowance rate (68% of decided cases) describes historical outcomes across all these art units combined and is not a prediction for any individual application. The stated range (45% to 77%) indicates variation in allowance rates among the examiner's art units; individual art-unit records appear in a separate detailed section. Pooled statistics describe the past record only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 231 decided applications with an interview and 133 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 144 decided applications with an interview and 72 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 36 decided applications with an interview and 32 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Marcin R Filipczyk has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 731 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP