Examiner Mardochee Chery has allowed 996 of 1,127 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mardochee Chery maintains a public record across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 1,127 decided applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 88%, reflecting 996 allowed applications and 131 abandoned applications. The allowance rate ranges from 74% to 93% across the art units in which the examiner has a substantial record, indicating variation in outcomes by subject matter within the technology center.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units in TC 2100. The figures presented—allowance rate, application counts, and the range across units—describe the examiner's past record only. They do not constitute a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregated statistics smooth variation between individual art units and represent historical disposal patterns, not forward-looking guidance.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 233 decided applications with an interview and 481 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 75 decided applications with an interview and 234 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 29 decided applications with an interview and 75 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mardochee Chery has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,152 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP