Examiner Marie G Cabucos

What the data says.

Marie G Cabucos holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 63 disposed applications, she allowed 41 and abandoned 22, yielding a 65% allowance rate. This rate reflects decided cases only and excludes any pending applications. The record aggregates her work across the single art unit in TC 2100 and describes her historical performance without predicting outcomes on any individual application.

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's pooled record aggregates all applications decided across her assigned art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 65% allowance rate is a historical aggregate of past decisions and reflects the proportion of allowed versus abandoned cases among applications already disposed. Aggregate figures describe past record only and are not predictions about any specific application's outcome. Individual art-unit breakdowns may appear elsewhere on this page.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Marie G Cabucos

• 01What is Marie G Cabucos's overall allowance rate?

  Her allowance rate is 65%, calculated across 63 disposed applications (41 allowed, 22 abandoned). This figure reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  Marie G Cabucos's record spans one art unit in Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the pooled record represent?

  The pooled record aggregates all disposed applications across all art units assigned to this examiner. It describes historical performance and is not a prediction of the outcome of any pending or future application.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.