Examiner Mark A Radtke has allowed 107 of 168 decided applications (64%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mark A Radtke maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a single art unit, he has disposed of 168 applications, of which 107 were allowed and 61 abandoned. His allowance rate is 64% over the 168 decided applications. This figure represents the proportion of applications that reached an allowance decision, excluding any pending cases. The record reflects outcomes across TC 2100 subject matter pooled without breakdown by individual art unit.
A pooled record aggregates results across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate shown here—64%—is calculated from all decided applications in that aggregated pool and describes the examiner's historical outcomes. Aggregate figures characterize past dispositions and do not constitute a prediction of how any single application will be examined or decided. Individual art units may show variation not visible in the pooled view.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 75 decided applications with an interview and 93 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mark A Radtke has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 168 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP