LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MARK P FRANCIS
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Mark P Francis

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 116 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION AUG 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Mark P Francis has allowed 86 of 116 decided applications (74%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

74% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Mark P Francis maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 116 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 86 and abandoned 30, yielding an allowance rate of 74%. This figure represents the share of decided applications and excludes pending cases. The examiner's practice spans one art unit within TC 2100. The 74% allowance rate is calculated from the pooled record across all art units and reflects historical disposition data only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record is a pooled aggregate across all art units in which the examiner works. Allowance rates derived from pooled data describe past decisions on closed applications and do not function as predictions about any specific pending application. Aggregated figures combine different subject-matter areas and examination contexts. To understand performance in a particular art unit or technology area, consult the per-art-unit breakdown, which appears separately on this page.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2193
116 APPS · 74% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.

74% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 70%
DISPOSITION86 / 30 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION37.5 moart unit avg 30.6 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY58.1 moart unit avg 44 mo
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW98%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW57%+41 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 48 decided applications with an interview and 68 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Mark P Francis

  • What is Mark P Francis's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 74%, calculated from 86 allowed applications and 30 abandoned applications out of 116 total disposed applications. This is a historical figure and not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Mark P Francis works in one art unit within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • What does the allowance rate include and exclude?
    The allowance rate of 74% covers only decided applications—those allowed or abandoned. It excludes pending applications. The figure is pooled across all art units where the examiner works.
  • Can I use this allowance rate to predict the outcome of my application?
    No. The 74% allowance rate is a historical aggregate of past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual applications are examined on their own merits.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mark P Francis has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 116 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP