Examiner Marshon L Robinson has allowed 191 of 330 decided applications (58%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Marshon L Robinson maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 330 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 58%, with 191 allowed and 139 abandoned applications. This rate reflects decisions on applications that have been resolved; it does not include pending filings. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, pooling all dispositions within that unit for this overall profile.
A pooled record aggregates all dispositions across an examiner's art units into a single allowance-rate figure. This aggregate describes the examiner's historical record and reflects past decisions on resolved applications. The rate is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures are most useful as a general reference to an examiner's past practice; they do not account for variation by art unit, technology, or application circumstances.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 39 decided applications with an interview and 291 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Marshon L Robinson has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 330 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP