LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MARWAN AYASH
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Marwan Ayash

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 402 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Marwan Ayash has allowed 276 of 402 decided applications (69%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

69% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2133 · 77%AU 2185 · 54%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Marwan Ayash maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 402 disposed applications, 276 were allowed, yielding a 69% allowance rate. The allowance rate ranges from 54% to 77% across these art units, reflecting variation in the examiner's record within the technology center. The examiner's caseload spans distinct areas of subject matter within TC 2100, with the pooled figure representing an aggregate measure of outcomes across both units.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units, masking individual variation. The overall allowance rate of 69% describes past outcomes on 402 decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. The range (54% to 77%) indicates that allowance rates differ materially among the examiner's art units. This pooled view does not isolate performance within any single art unit or technology area—separate data are available for each unit.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2133
278 APPS · 77% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

77% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 82%
DISPOSITION195 / 58 / 25allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.4 moart unit avg 22.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY41.3 moart unit avg 34.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility30% · art unit 22%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)20%
§103 — Obviousness96% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness48%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW83%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW62%+21 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 180 decided applications with an interview and 73 without.

ART UNIT 2185
149 APPS · 54% ALLOWANCE
54% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 67%
DISPOSITION81 / 68 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION27.4 moart unit avg 21.6 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY55.3 moart unit avg 36.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility50% · art unit 19%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)19%
§103 — Obviousness94% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness46%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW65%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW50%+15 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 46 decided applications with an interview and 103 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Marwan Ayash

  • What is Marwan Ayash's overall allowance rate?
    69% of 402 disposed applications were allowed.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    2 art units (2133 and 2185) within TC 2100.
  • What is the range of allowance rates across the art units?
    Allowance rates range from 54% to 77% across these art units.
  • Does the overall rate predict my application's outcome?
    No. The overall rate describes past outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application. Outcomes vary by art unit and case.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Marwan Ayash has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 427 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP